Base structure of Sanskrit as archaic Tamil

I am amazed how easy it is to locate the base structure of Sanskrit and which is Archaic Tamil.

The moment you look at Sanskrit with an eye for SumeroTamil, the Tamil hidden within it appears to the fore............... .. I have analysed hundreds of such words and continue to do and which DISCLOSES that Sanskrit is just another variant of Tamil. These are the reasons that lead me to say that Rigk is a variant of SumeroTamil.

Perhaps you can say Sanskrit became OBSOLETE or reduced to the language of rituals and liturgies only because Tamil, in its continuation of SumeroTamil became well established as the spoken and literary language.

Let me give you an example "ratna-hatu-tamam" the last word of the first sloka of Rig.

This is a Compound word (CW) formed through agglutinating 'ratnam' 'dhaatu' and 'tamam' where all these roots are Tamil as well as the syntactic feature of agglutinating.

The root of 'ratnam' is 'raa' and which is Sumerian ri-a(> ra, raa) something that shines forth. From the same root we have Tamil eri: fire. The 'nam; is a noun formative quite common in Sumerian but which exists as 'x-am' in Tamil. For e.g. nam-tar-ra, nam-en-na etc and which probably was READ as tar-ra-nam, en-na-nam etc.. The tar-ra-nam , the given ( Ta. taru, taa: to give) has become tar-mam ( > dharma, dhamma) and from which we 'tanmam' 'tamam' etc . The 'dhatu' is also related to Su. ta, tar and Ta. taa (> Sk dha) . Thus dhatu ( > Ta. taatu) is that which gives but in an elemental way.

When we analyse this CW 'ratna-dhatu-tamam' we UNEARTH its etymological roots and which is NOT possible if not for a sound knowledge of SumeroTamil and Classical Tamil.

What the prevailing IndoAryanism does is DISALLOW such studies, where Sanskrit is grouped as an IndoEuropean language.

Ullaganar
( 1-7-2004, TOL )